This is a playful collection of stories, linked by the unique voice of the central character. The title is a clever play on the 1989 movie Look Who’s Talking, and many stories pay homage to aspects of the 80s… These are not just well-written, humorous stories though – there are many reflections on identity… [Link to full review] (Annie Condon, 23 April 2009)

Benjamin Solah

Look Who’s Morphing is a humorous collection that breaks rules and gets away with it… In a lot of the pieces, the narrator is referred to as ‘Tom Cho’ and due to the extravagance of some of the stories; the pieces can come across as Tom living out some his fantasies… The weaker story in the collection, in my opinion, was the final story, ‘Cock Rock’… the main thing was that the gender politics of the final piece were quite questionable, and I was uncomfortable with the way the character acted. The problem being that when a character is presented as the author it can lead to readers attributing the character’s behaviour to the author as well – but I’m not so sure that that’s a fair statement to make. [Link to full review] (13 September 2009)

Booksquawk

… The standout was ‘Cock Rock’, the conclusion to the book, that was as weird as any other story in the collection. It was self-indulgent reveling in fantasy. In rock-stardom, power, size, sexual conquest and self-bestowed god-hood. But, throughout this story, it’s obvious that Cho knows all this and is convincing you to come for the ride anyway. And you do… So is (my) short-story curse broken? Not even close. I don’t want to pick up any more short-story collections. What if they’re not as good as ‘Look Who’s Morphing’? Could I stand the disappointment? (S.F. Winser) [Link to full review] (2 Jan 2010)

Same Same

… The book, in my opinion, is best read without analysing its content too much. It’s humorous, and Cho’s experimental style is fresh and inventive. The striking cover, with a photo of Cho dressed as what we learn to be Fonz from the sitcom Happy Days, with pink blood oozing from a gash, makes it clear that the book, in spite of its numerous metaphors and references, is not meant to be taken too seriously… [Link to full review] (24 July 2009)

Sydney Star Observer and Southern Star